We investigated the failing E2E task and determined it is unrelated to the PR changes. The error is a port conflict (EADDRINUSE 127.0.0.1:36167) caused by another process occupying the port on the CI runner at the time the test server tried to start. Since this PR only bumps package versions with no source or config changes, a rerun should resolve the issue.
Self-Healing CI
Classification: Environment state
An empty commit was applied to the branch to trigger a new CI pipeline execution to resolve the environment issue.
The AI model provider was experiencing issues when this fix was generated.
The failure was classified as environment_state rather than code_change for the following reasons:
The PR contains no source code changes — it is a pure changeset version-bump PR generated by the Changesets release action, updating package version numbers only.
The touched_projects list is empty ([]), meaning no project in the monorepo was directly modified by this PR's file changes.
The error is a port conflict:
EADDRINUSE: address already in use 127.0.0.1:36167. The external test server fortanstack-router-e2e-vue-basic-esbuild-file-basedcould not bind to port 36167 because another process already held it on the CI runner. This is a runner-level infrastructure issue, not something introduced by the PR.There is no version-bump or dependency change in this PR that could plausibly cause a port binding conflict in a test server.
The flakiness rate for the task is 0%, which rules out a classification of flaky_task, but it does not point toward code_change either — the 0% rate simply means this task does not intermittently fail due to timing, it failed here due to an occupied port at the OS level.
No similar failure was found in branch 8121, confirming this is not a recurring cross-branch regression introduced by shared code.