Overview - @o3r/framework

@o3r/framework

7 days30 days

Latest CI Pipeline Executions

Exact

Failed
main
fbc02fa5 fix(training): monaco editor tooltips not fully visible
5 hours ago by fpaul-1A
Succeeded
main
fbc02fa5 fix(training): monaco editor tooltips not fully visible
6 hours ago by fpaul-1A
Succeeded
main
fbc02fa5 fix(training): monaco editor tooltips not fully visible
6 hours ago by fpaul-1A
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
6 hours ago by matthieu-c...
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
7 hours ago by matthieu-c...
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
7 hours ago by renovate[bot]
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
7 hours ago by renovate[bot]
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by matthieu-c...
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by renovate[bot]
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by renovate[bot]
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by github-mer...
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by github-mer...
Succeeded
main
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by github-mer...
Succeeded
gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2516-8dd1971b9a7e332b50deb2d2ad48020d89b474b9
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by matthieu-c...
Succeeded
gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2516-8dd1971b9a7e332b50deb2d2ad48020d89b474b9
ebfb1894 fix(rules-engine): allow custom action in the rulesets schema (#2516) ## Proposed change Today if we create a custom action handler, we can't write a `rulesets.json` validating the schema exposed.
8 hours ago by matthieu-c...
Succeeded
main
8dd1971b deprecate(rules-engine): actionHandlers will become protected in v13 (#2518) ## Proposed change It's not a good practice to expose a `Set`. I added a method `registerActionHandlers` to replace the usage of `actionHandlers.add(...)`. It will be future proof if we want to do something else when an action handler is registered.
8 hours ago by fpaul-1A
Succeeded
main
8dd1971b deprecate(rules-engine): actionHandlers will become protected in v13 (#2518) ## Proposed change It's not a good practice to expose a `Set`. I added a method `registerActionHandlers` to replace the usage of `actionHandlers.add(...)`. It will be future proof if we want to do something else when an action handler is registered.
9 hours ago by github-mer...
Succeeded
main
8dd1971b deprecate(rules-engine): actionHandlers will become protected in v13 (#2518) ## Proposed change It's not a good practice to expose a `Set`. I added a method `registerActionHandlers` to replace the usage of `actionHandlers.add(...)`. It will be future proof if we want to do something else when an action handler is registered.
9 hours ago by github-mer...
Succeeded
main
8dd1971b deprecate(rules-engine): actionHandlers will become protected in v13 (#2518) ## Proposed change It's not a good practice to expose a `Set`. I added a method `registerActionHandlers` to replace the usage of `actionHandlers.add(...)`. It will be future proof if we want to do something else when an action handler is registered.
9 hours ago by github-mer...
Succeeded
gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-2518-a1182f530c78b2dd3619527c1fcb0ed69f5d6630
8dd1971b deprecate(rules-engine): actionHandlers will become protected in v13 (#2518) ## Proposed change It's not a good practice to expose a `Set`. I added a method `registerActionHandlers` to replace the usage of `actionHandlers.add(...)`. It will be future proof if we want to do something else when an action handler is registered.
9 hours ago by matthieu-c...