{"prompt":"You are comparing an AI-suggested code fix with actual changes made in a commit.\n\nYour task: Determine if the commit contains the essence of the AI fix and provide a confidence level.\n\n## AI-Suggested Fix\n\n**What it fixes:** @tanstack/react-router:test:eslint, @tanstack/react-router:test:unit\n\n**Description:** fix(react-router): remove extra closing brackets in errorComponent test\n\n**Reasoning:** The PR added a new test to reproduce issue #2514, but through multiple successive edits to the file, the closing brackets for the `test(...)` and `describe(...)` blocks were duplicated at the end of the file.\n\nThe file ended up with four closing brackets where only two were needed:\n- Line 361: ` })` — correctly closes the `test(...)` callback\n- Line 362: `})` — correctly closes the `describe(...)` callback\n- Line 363: ` })` — **extra**, unmatched, causes the parse error\n- Line 364: `})` — **ex\n\n**Suggested Changes (diff):**\n```diff\ndiff --git a/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx b/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx\nindex 3f6678e7f2..dafa6781b1 100644\n--- a/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx\n+++ b/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx\n@@ -359,6 +359,4 @@ describe('notFoundComponent is rendered when an error is thrown in params.parse'\n expect(rootLoader).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)\n expect(notFoundComponent).toBeInTheDocument()\n })\n-})\n- })\n })\n\n```\n\n## Actual Commit Changes\n\n**Commit Diff:**\n```diff\ndiff --git a/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx b/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx\nindex 62233bb48dc..077f5b24a47 100644\n--- a/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx\n+++ b/packages/react-router/tests/errorComponent.test.tsx\n@@ -3,12 +3,15 @@ import { act, cleanup, fireEvent, render, screen } from '@testing-library/react'\n \n import {\n Link,\n+ Outlet,\n RouterProvider,\n createBrowserHistory,\n createLazyRoute,\n+ createMemoryHistory,\n createRootRoute,\n createRoute,\n createRouter,\n+ notFound,\n } from '../src'\n import type { ErrorComponentProps, RouterHistory } from '../src'\n \n@@ -258,3 +261,101 @@ describe.each([true, false])(\n })\n },\n )\n+\n+describe('notFoundComponent is rendered when an error is thrown in params.parse', () => {\n+ test('displays notFoundComponent when error is thrown in params.parse', async () => {\n+ const history = createMemoryHistory({ initialEntries: ['/'] })\n+ const rootLoader = vi.fn(async () => {\n+ await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 1))\n+ return { ok: true }\n+ })\n+\n+ const rootRoute = createRootRoute({\n+ component: function Root() {\n+ return \n+ },\n+ notFoundComponent: function NotFound() {\n+ return

No pizza

\n+ },\n+ pendingComponent: function Pending() {\n+ return

\n+ },\n+ loader: rootLoader,\n+ shouldReload: true,\n+ pendingMs: 0,\n+ pendingMinMs: 100,\n+ wrapInSuspense: true,\n+ })\n+\n+ const indexRoute = createRoute({\n+ getParentRoute: () => rootRoute,\n+ path: '/',\n+ component: function Home() {\n+ return (\n+

\n+ \n+ link to rotten pizza\n+ \n+

\n+ )\n+ },\n+ })\n+\n+ const restaurantRoute = createRoute({\n+ getParentRoute: () => rootRoute,\n+ id: 'restaurant',\n+ component: function Restaurant() {\n+ return \n+ },\n+ })\n+\n+ const pizzaRoute = createRoute({\n+ getParentRoute: () => restaurantRoute,\n+ path: '/pizza/$pizzaType',\n+ component: function Pizza() {\n+ return

Pizza

\n+ },\n+ params: {\n+ parse: (p) => {\n+ if (p.pizzaType === 'rotten') {\n+ throw new Error('404 No rotten pizzas')\n+ }\n+ return { pizzaType: p.pizzaType }\n+ },\n+ stringify: (p) => ({ pizzaType: p.pizzaType }),\n+ },\n+ onError: () => {\n+ throw notFound()\n+ },\n+ })\n+\n+ const routeTree = rootRoute.addChildren([\n+ indexRoute,\n+ restaurantRoute.addChildren([pizzaRoute]),\n+ ])\n+\n+ const router = createRouter({\n+ routeTree,\n+ history,\n+ })\n+\n+ render()\n+\n+ await act(() => router.latestLoadPromise)\n+ expect(rootLoader).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)\n+\n+ const linkToRottenPizza = await screen.findByRole('link', {\n+ name: 'link to rotten pizza',\n+ })\n+\n+ expect(linkToRottenPizza).toBeInTheDocument()\n+ await act(() => fireEvent.mouseOver(linkToRottenPizza))\n+ await act(() => fireEvent.click(linkToRottenPizza))\n+\n+ const notFoundComponent = await screen.findByText('No pizza', undefined, {\n+ timeout: 750,\n+ })\n+ expect(rootLoader).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)\n+ expect(notFoundComponent).toBeInTheDocument()\n+ })\n+})\n\n```\n\n## Instructions\n\nRate how similar the commit is to the AI fix on a scale of 0-10.\n\n**Scoring Guide:**\n- 10: Nearly identical changes (same files, same logic, same fixes)\n- 8-9: Very similar (same core changes, minor differences in implementation)\n- 6-7: Similar intent (addresses same issue, somewhat different approach)\n- 4-5: Some overlap (touches same area, but different changes)\n- 2-3: Minimal similarity (different files or completely different changes)\n- 0-1: No similarity (unrelated changes)\n\n**Criteria:**\n- Focus on: same files modified, similar logic changes, same bug being fixed\n- The commit may have additional changes beyond the AI fix - that's okay\n- Small differences in implementation are okay if the intent is the same\n\nProvide your score (0-10) and a brief reasoning (2-3 sentences) explaining your assessment.","response":"{\"score\":0,\"reasoning\":\"The AI-suggested fix targets removing duplicate closing brackets from the errorComponent.test.tsx file (lines 362-364). However, the actual commit shows a completely different change: it adds a new test case for the notFoundComponent functionality starting at line 264, along with some import additions at the top of the file. The commit does not address the bracket duplication issue that the AI fix was designed to solve. These are fundamentally different changes to the same file.\"}","model":"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001","cipeFixId":"69f7cb513e89d7f4edc2662e","headSha":"1defaae6fcdf39abd20eb93d850061333c8d8584","timestamp":1777847460265}

Resource usage is collected per agent